Guide · Blue Ocean Strategy
Blue Ocean Strategy Canvas: How to Map Uncontested Markets
The Blue Ocean Strategy Canvas is one of the most powerful — and most misunderstood — strategic frameworks. Published by W. Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne in 2005, it gives companies a visual method for escaping competitive "red oceans" (bloody, crowded markets) and creating "blue oceans" (uncontested market space). The problem is that most teams draw the canvas wrong, choose the wrong factors, and end up with a diagram that confirms their existing strategy instead of challenging it. This guide shows you how to do it properly.
What the strategy canvas is
The strategy canvas is a line chart where the X axis lists the key competing factors in an industry (the things companies invest in and customers evaluate), and the Y axis shows the relative level of offering across each factor. Each competitor gets a line — called a "value curve" — that connects their scores across all factors.
When you plot all major competitors on the same canvas, their value curves tend to converge. They invest in the same factors at the same levels because they are competing on the same terms. A blue ocean strategy means drawing a value curve that looks fundamentally different — high where others are low, absent where others invest heavily, and present on factors that do not exist yet.
Example: US wine industry (from the original Blue Ocean book)
X axis factors: Price, marketing prestige, aging quality, vineyard prestige, wine complexity, wine range, above-the-line marketing, ease of drinking, ease of selection, fun and adventure
Traditional competitors (Gallo, Mondavi): High on vineyard prestige, aging quality, wine complexity. Low on ease of drinking and fun.
Yellow Tail (blue ocean entrant): Eliminated aging quality and vineyard prestige. Raised ease of drinking and fun. Created "easy to select" (one red, one white). The value curve crossed the incumbent curves — high where they were low, absent where they invested.
The Eliminate-Reduce-Raise-Create (ERRC) grid
The ERRC grid is the operational tool behind the strategy canvas. It forces you to make four specific decisions about the factors on your canvas. Most teams can fill in "Raise" and "Create" easily (these are the fun ones). The strategic discipline is in "Eliminate" and "Reduce" — because blue oceans are not created by adding more. They are created by breaking the conventional trade-offs.
Eliminate
Which factors that the industry has long competed on should be eliminated entirely? These are factors that customers no longer value (or never valued as much as the industry assumed). Eliminating them frees up cost and complexity.
Yellow Tail eliminated wine aging, vineyard prestige, and the entire fine-wine vocabulary from its value proposition.
Reduce
Which factors should be reduced well below the industry standard? These are areas where the industry over-delivers relative to what the target customer actually needs. Reducing them frees up cost without losing the customer.
Yellow Tail reduced wine complexity and wine range to just two options: a Chardonnay and a Shiraz.
Raise
Which factors should be raised well above the industry standard? These are areas where the industry under-delivers relative to what your target customer wants. Raising them creates differentiation on dimensions competitors have neglected.
Yellow Tail raised ease of drinking to make wine as approachable as beer or cocktails.
Create
Which factors should be created that the industry has never offered? These are entirely new sources of value that redefine the buyer experience. Created factors are the most powerful because competitors cannot respond without changing their entire strategy.
Yellow Tail created "fun and adventure" as a wine category factor — something no premium wine brand had attempted.
Step-by-step: building your strategy canvas
List 8-12 competing factors
Start by identifying the factors that the industry currently competes on. These are the things companies invest money in and the criteria customers use to choose between options. Interview customers and study competitor marketing to find them. Be specific — "quality" is too vague; "material durability" or "response time under 2 hours" is useful.
Score each competitor on each factor
Use a simple 1-5 scale. The goal is not precision — it is relative positioning. Score based on public evidence: pricing pages, product features, customer reviews, marketing messages. Include yourself. If you cannot score a competitor on a factor, it is a signal that the factor may not be visible to customers either.
Draw the value curves
Plot each competitor as a line connecting their scores across all factors. Use different colours for each competitor. The shape of the curve matters more than the individual scores. Look for convergence — factors where all competitors score similarly. Convergence means the industry has agreed on a standard that may not serve customers well.
Identify convergence zones and gaps
Convergence zones are where competitors cluster at similar levels. These represent industry assumptions that may be ripe for elimination or reduction. Gaps are factors where scores are spread widely — these indicate that the market has not settled on a standard, which means there is room for a distinctive position.
Apply the ERRC grid
For each factor, decide: eliminate, reduce, raise, or keep at industry standard. Then add 1-2 factors that should be created. The discipline is making hard trade-offs — a blue ocean strategy that raises everything and eliminates nothing is just a premium strategy, not a new market.
Draw your new value curve
Plot your proposed value curve on the same canvas as the competitors. It should look visually different — crossing the competitor curves rather than running parallel. If it does not cross, you have not made enough trade-offs. Go back to the ERRC grid and be more aggressive.
Test with the three characteristics
A good blue ocean strategy canvas has three characteristics. Focus: the value curve shows clear highs and lows, not a flat line. Divergence: your curve looks different from competitor curves. Compelling tagline: you can describe the new strategy in one sentence that customers would understand.
LandscapeBrief
See where the blue ocean actually is
Upload your competitor data and LandscapeBrief maps the entire competitive landscape on a 2x2 quadrant. The empty quadrants are your blue ocean. Strategy brief included.
Find Your Blue Ocean Free →Real-world strategy canvas examples
The Blue Ocean Strategy book provides several canonical examples. Here are three that illustrate different applications of the framework, along with what made their value curves distinctive.
Cirque du Soleil
Entertainment / circusBy eliminating the most expensive elements of traditional circuses (animals, star performers) and creating theatrical production value, Cirque du Soleil could charge 5-10x the price of a traditional circus while spending far less on operations.
Southwest Airlines
AirlinesSouthwest redefined the competitor set. They were not competing with Delta and United — they were competing with Greyhound and personal cars. This changed which factors mattered and made the blue ocean visible.
Nintendo Wii
Gaming consolesWhile Sony and Microsoft competed on processing power and graphics (the traditional gaming factors), Nintendo eliminated those factors entirely and created a new one: physical, social gameplay that non-gamers could enjoy. The Wii outsold both competitors for three years.
Common strategy canvas mistakes
×Choosing factors that favour your company
The factors should represent what the industry competes on, not what you are good at. If your canvas makes you look uniquely excellent on every dimension, you have cherry-picked the factors. Start with factors from customer interviews and competitor marketing — not from your own product roadmap.
×Not eliminating anything
The hardest part of the ERRC grid is elimination. Most teams cannot bring themselves to completely drop factors that the industry considers important. But elimination is where cost savings and strategic clarity come from. If you have not eliminated at least two factors, you have not made a blue ocean choice.
×Treating the canvas as a one-time exercise
Blue oceans do not stay blue. As you succeed, competitors will copy your innovations and the value curves will converge again. Revisit the canvas annually and watch for the moment your curve starts looking like everyone else's.
×Confusing "different" with "better"
A blue ocean strategy is not about being better on existing factors — that is a red ocean move. It is about changing which factors matter. If your value curve is just higher than competitors on the same factors, you have built a premium product, not a blue ocean.
×Skipping the non-customer analysis
Blue oceans are found by understanding non-customers — the people who reject your industry entirely. Why do they not buy? What would need to change? Yellow Tail did not succeed by studying wine drinkers. They succeeded by studying beer and cocktail drinkers who found wine intimidating.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between a strategy canvas and a competitive landscape map?
A strategy canvas plots competitors across multiple competing factors (a line chart). A competitive landscape map (like a 2x2 quadrant) plots competitors on exactly two dimensions. They complement each other: the quadrant map shows positioning; the strategy canvas shows the full factor-by-factor comparison. Use the quadrant to identify whitespace, and the strategy canvas to design the value curve that occupies it.
How many competing factors should a strategy canvas have?
8 to 12 is the practical range. Fewer than 8 and you miss important dimensions. More than 12 and the canvas becomes cluttered and hard to read. The factors should be specific enough to be measurable but broad enough to be strategically meaningful.
Can you build a Blue Ocean Strategy Canvas for a startup that has not launched yet?
Yes, and it is often the best time to do it. Before launch, you have maximum flexibility to shape your value curve. Plot the incumbent value curves based on competitor research, then design your curve to be deliberately different. The ERRC grid becomes your product strategy — it tells you what to build, what to skip, and what to invent.
How is Blue Ocean Strategy different from disruption theory?
Disruption theory (Clayton Christensen) focuses on low-end disruption — entering a market with a simpler, cheaper product that incumbents ignore. Blue Ocean Strategy is broader — it includes low-end moves but also covers creating entirely new demand by redefining the value factors. A Blue Ocean strategy can be premium-priced (like Cirque du Soleil) whereas disruptive innovation typically starts cheap.
Ready?
Stop fighting over red oceans. Find the white space.
LandscapeBrief visualises your competitive landscape and identifies uncontested space automatically.
Map Your Competitive Landscape Free →